Date: 12 Jul 2000 09:31:54 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why don't section 4 pages live with their drivers? Message-ID: <xzpog43g5xx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Wes Peters's message of "Sat, 08 Jul 2000 10:54:37 -0600" References: <20000707082617.L25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000707081202.J25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007061848400.66456-100000@login-1.eunet.no> <200007070438.WAA58169@harmony.village.org> <20000707081202.J25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <200007071522.JAA62042@harmony.village.org> <200007071535.JAA62175@harmony.village.org> <39675CCD.D3FC41FF@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> writes: > Seems like a src/sys/man heirarchy would solve both the problems. I second this; kernel-related man pages should live in the kernel source code, but should not be spread all over and clutter up the source directories. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpog43g5xx.fsf>