Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:05:53 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@dougbarton.net>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mntopts.h mount.8 mount.c src/sbin/mount_std mount_std.8
Message-ID:  <20041130090553.GA691@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <41AC3332.7040809@DougBarton.net>
References:  <200411290935.iAT9Z17L087708@repoman.freebsd.org> <41AC3332.7040809@DougBarton.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Doug,

On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:45:38AM +0200, Doug Barton wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > ru          2004-11-29 09:35:01 UTC
> >=20
> >   FreeBSD src repository
> >=20
> >   Modified files:
> >     sbin/mount           mntopts.h mount.8 mount.c=20
> >     sbin/mount_std       mount_std.8=20
> >   Log:
> >   Fix the mount(8) status reporting, now that MNT_NODEV is a no-op (zer=
o).
> >  =20
> >   Asked to commit by:     phk
> >  =20
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.23      +0 -2      src/sbin/mount/mntopts.h
> >   1.69      +1 -7      src/sbin/mount/mount.8
> >   1.67      +0 -2      src/sbin/mount/mount.c
> >   1.23      +1 -2      src/sbin/mount_std/mount_std.8
> >=20
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/mntopts.h.diff?&r1=
=3D1.22&r2=3D1.23&f=3Dh
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/mount.8.diff?&r1=
=3D1.68&r2=3D1.69&f=3Dh
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/mount.c.diff?&r1=
=3D1.66&r2=3D1.67&f=3Dh
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount_std/mount_std.8.di=
ff?&r1=3D1.22&r2=3D1.23&f=3Dh
>=20
> FYI, this commit seems to have broken my line in fstab which has worked f=
or
> a long time:
>=20
> md                      /tmp    mfs     rw,-s16m,noatime,nosuid,nodev 2 0
>=20
> Is it useful for the nodev option to cause a hard failure here? Note, I'm
> not arguing against either change, just pointing out a side effect.
>=20
There's no longer a "nodev" option, please ask Poul-Henning for details.  ;)


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBrDfxqRfpzJluFF4RAiTRAJwJKYExBlOli7Pnn6tFs/g9Ew+fwwCgkr5a
UvRBuo6V3j8BoIKbBVgdDWs=
=UZ1X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041130090553.GA691>