Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 09:31:06 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, dteske@FreeBSD.org, jamie@FreeBSD.org, slw@zxy.spb.ru Subject: Re: jail configuration Message-ID: <8638oerh39.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20131006.102310.20550923549608963.hrs@allbsd.org> (Hiroki Sato's message of "Sun, 06 Oct 2013 10:23:10 %2B0900 (JST)") References: <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FBCA6EB@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> <86d2o8k6zf.fsf@nine.des.no> <20131006.102310.20550923549608963.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> I tried to rewrite a rc.d/jail with backward compatibility. [...]
> What do you think about this?
I think it sounds fantastic (and like a lot of work!)
I didn't look at the patch very closely, but I see that you print a
warning when you generate a configuration for an old-style jail while
jail.conf exists. I think you should *always* print that warning for
every old-style jail so people will be reminded to convert. We should
also remove the examples from /etc/defaults/rc.conf and replace the
documentation for jail_${_j}_* in rc.conf(5) with a short paragraph that
says they are for compatibility only.
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8638oerh39.fsf>