Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 20:03:30 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Vin=C3=ADcius_dos_Santos_Oliveira?= <vini.ipsmaker@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aio_read2() and aio_write2() Message-ID: <CAK9RveLELz7ApdUAvr6Qo7p6tA28wvq0vBogaAeGCgnD7c4Rjg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ZaLplyztsogCXSEZ@kib.kiev.ua> References: <CAK9RveK=sUc=xSExehvNwH92uTexjhp0=L63sbw-sfkRFdV4Dg@mail.gmail.com> <ZaF4tWnqhKrNtNBI@kib.kiev.ua> <CAK9RveJfZkESHpQjhO1%2Byn%2BUkvw0Vr5u8fyZBgSh3a8RWqv=bw@mail.gmail.com> <ZaLplyztsogCXSEZ@kib.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Em sáb., 13 de jan. de 2024 às 16:51, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> escreveu: > Please see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43448; not tested. > Effectively I added the new ops to lio_listio(2) instead. It looks right to me. However the flag is confusing. I'd suggest using LIO_FNOFFSET instead as it means the opposite of FOF_OFFSET. -- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://vinipsmaker.github.io/help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK9RveLELz7ApdUAvr6Qo7p6tA28wvq0vBogaAeGCgnD7c4Rjg>
