Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:15:20 +1030 From: "Aluminium Oxide" <orac000@internet-mail.org> To: "Jo Rhett" <jrhett@svcolo.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUMMARY: Fast releases demand binary updates.. Message-ID: <1137555920.22862.252108320@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <20060112080856.GI84964@svcolo.com> References: <20060112080856.GI84964@svcolo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:08:56 -0800, "Jo Rhett" <jrhett@svcolo.com> said: > 12 or so honest queries on the mailing list about why "make buildworld" > or the freebsd-update mechanism doesn't work for me. Which I try to > answer > in detail, even when the questioner was insulting me. Why doesn't make buildworld work for you? I find myself replacing binary packages with source more often than not, to effect a better tracking with cvs. I'm guessing, but it sounds like you're after some sort of replacement to the cvs approach in binary form. Right? -- Aluminium Oxide orac000@internet-mail.org -- http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1137555920.22862.252108320>