Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:18:39 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: FreeBSD@jovi.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/33904: secure mode bug Message-ID: <99187.1011172719@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2002 01:09:37 PST." <20020116010937.K31328@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 01:09:37 PST, "Crist J . Clark" wrote: > I think there is a valid point. The settimeofday(2) call returns > success even though the change requested by the call is not really > done. This is somewhat questionable behavior. The documentation for > settimeofday(2) was not clear about how this works under elevated > securelevel(8), and in fact, the documentation is actually wrong > (which I will fix shortly). I'm not disputing the need to correct settimeofday(2). The PR is already assigned to nsayer with a request to do this. But that's it. The notion of changing the documentation of all userland consumers is what I'm challenging. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99187.1011172719>