Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251796] bsd.port.mk: make on unmaintained port outputs a URL that returns "Page Not Found" Message-ID: <bug-251796-7788-dwnob2KHrA@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251796-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251796-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251796 Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|make on unmaintained port |bsd.port.mk: make on |outputs a URL that returns |unmaintained port outputs a |"Page Not Found" |URL that returns "Page Not | |Found" --- Comment #2 from Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Phil Budne from comment #1) Bugmeister notes: since it is in Mk/*.mk, yes, it's "Ports Framework". But really it does not make as much difference as people assume -- in general, the same people loo= k at ports PRs in both "Individual Ports" and "Ports Framework". The choice to only show the former is intentional, due to the high number of errors when people submit PRs. My personal opinion is that "Package Infrastructure" should never be shown = to the general public. It was intended only for "issues affecting the build machines @FreeBSD.org" and has never really been used for that purpose, ins= tead only attracting false positives. If you want to file a bug for the bugmeisters to look at, use Services/Bug Tracker. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251796-7788-dwnob2KHrA>