Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 14:56:20 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: mrcpu@cdsnet.net (Jaye Mathisen) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, davidg@root.com, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coding style ( was Re: why is this not a bug in namei?) Message-ID: <199509192156.OAA10858@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.950919144400.11169r-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net> from "Jaye Mathisen" at Sep 19, 95 02:44:37 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The real question is does this have to be bashed around on hackers... > Seems like a basically religious issue, which deserves it's own majordomo > list... No, this is Nate taking up David's Ad Homin attack on my coding style, which obfuscated the original issue of 16 bit Unicode characters in the kernel. Overall coding style is a matter for an indent program built into the "cvs commit" procedure. The question "how do I determine program flow when I see a goto?" is a stupid question. The *real* question is whether we want to be able to mount Win95 and Windows NT file systems. or not. It has nothing to do with whether I use "too many" goto's in fixing code I wouldn't be in in the first place if it functioned correctly. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509192156.OAA10858>