Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:03:39 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com> To: D <donatas.gendvilas@telecom.lt> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: alternative routing - deadlock? Message-ID: <43E4279B.20200@alphaque.com> In-Reply-To: <069601c628c6$598ac4a0$4f6510ac@in.telecom.lt> References: <069601c628c6$598ac4a0$4f6510ac@in.telecom.lt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/03/06 21:32 D said the following: > on freebsd box such a simple situation(see below) seems to be pretty complicated: > > > ISP1[10.10.10.1][1Mbps]<-------------------->[ME-em0][10.10.10.10] > ISP2[11.11.11.1][8Mbps]---------------------->[ME-em1][11.11.11.11] > default route 10.10.10.1 > > any traffic "from ME to ISP2" will fail or will be redirected via ISP1. what exactly does 'netstat -rn' show ? > alternative routing function should allow us to add another static route: > default route 11.11.11.1 freebsd doesnt yet support multiple default routes, though you could use something like CARP and pf to implement some sort of load balancing/redundant link architecture. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E4279B.20200>