Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:14:40 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ifmcstat(8) setgidness Message-ID: <20010627111440.F2097@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20010626220407.B70933E31@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700 References: <20010626220407.B70933E31@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is there a particular reason, other than the desire for more setgid > programs, that ifmcstat(8) is setgid kmem? It seems that there's no > reason anyone but root would want to use it, anyway. OpenBSD and > NetBSD already nuked its setgid bit; any reason why we shouldn't > follow suit? > $ ifmcstat kvm_openfiles: Permission denied -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010627111440.F2097>