Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system? Message-ID: <201810222111.w9MLBisu013664@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <7832.1540241924@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -------- > In message <CANCZdfrMfEZxjwZGQZA6qEbZOm=91GKa8xweZwSUs-+iTeUUTA@mail.gmail.com> > , Warner Losh writes: > > >> > I think Julian Stacy is still running CTM generation ? > >> > >> Ah, yes, that brought back enough brain cells, > >> confirmed that is who I saw with ctm usage. > > > >Do we need it in base? Or can we make it a port? > > Absolutely make it a port! > I concur, but please hold off on the svn rm until Stephen Montgomery and Julian have acked that they can quickly and easily transition to a port, then I would even be fine with a MFC gone in(13) to stable/12 and an immediate rm from head. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201810222111.w9MLBisu013664>