Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:35:45 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? Message-ID: <a06001a16bb9ca20093ce@[10.0.1.4]> In-Reply-To: <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309271138260.459@a.shell.peak.org> <2493.67.85.96.168.1064692382.squirrel@www.wingfoot.org> <a06001a05bb9ba8d12cb8@[10.0.1.4]> <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:23 PM +0200 2003/09/28, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> The proper Unix thing is a single LF. DOS and Windows use the CR/LF
> combo; CR alone is a Mac convention.
I remembered that CR/LF were used in there somewhat, but
obviously was wrong in where they were used. Sigh....
Makes you wish that there were international standards for these
things that everyone had to follow. ;)
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a06001a16bb9ca20093ce>