Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:34:11 +0200 (EET) From: Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> Cc: gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch Subject: Re: SWT 3.0? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402171732480.16866-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040217101005.4fccdf61@kanpc.gte.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
O kyrios Alexander Kabaev egrapse stis Feb 17, 2004 : > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:09:57 +0100 > Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> wrote: > > > Hello Achilleus, > > > > Tuesday, February 17, 2004, 2:58:45 PM, you wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> I'm considering switching to FreeBSD as desktop (from W2K)and from > > >all I see,> the remaining major issue is that there is no SWT 3.0 for > > >it. I need> Eclipse 3.0 and I also want to use Azureus. > > >> > > >> So is anyone working on a SWT port? Or am I required to go with > > >Linux> for now? > > > > > Eclipse 2.1 runs great. (from the ports collection). > > > > Mhh maybe I look into that as to how they ported SWT 2.X as a base to > > porting SWT 3.X > > > > > What new features are in 3.0 ? > > > > > > Well I haven't actually looked into 2.1 very much but I always want > > the latest and greatest piece of software for my uses. And anyway, I > > really need Azureus ;-) (NFW I'm gonna go back to Python based > > Bittorrent). > > > I had Eclipse 3.0M6 built manually. You might be able to extract SWT > bits out of that. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/eclipse/linux-gtk-x86-sdk.zip Would be possible that someone converted this build of Eclipse 3 into a eclipse3 port? > > Don't get fooled by the 'linux' in file name, archive contains native > FreeBSD binaries. > -- -Achilleus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0402171732480.16866-100000>