Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:57:37 -0400 From: Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> To: Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND update? Message-ID: <4875EB21.6@protected-networks.net> In-Reply-To: <4875EA0C.5010109@modulus.org> References: <20080710094006.GX6902@e-Gitt.NET> <20080710094451.GS62764@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20080710095809.GA59288@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <4875E1B6.3010407@delphij.net> <4875EA0C.5010109@modulus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Snow wrote: | Xin LI wrote: |> Speaking as my own: Base system needs more conservative QA process, e.g. | ... |> rushing into a "presumably patched" state would not be a very good |> solution. | | I second this opinion. When there is hype all over the net about a new | vulnerability, it is too easy to allow ill-considered changes to be | rushed in without enough critical thought and testing. And even more so when the perceived "breakage" is in the design rather than any specific implementation, Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkh16yEACgkQQv9rrgRC1JKtCgCgoMbmQ+clRgDvZBbHzLJxB0No EgYAn15Hk/jUcDnnahN0msD1J6+xUa48 =oIUJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4875EB21.6>