Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 12:52:34 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r39249 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkOb2XX0k6FbGeYyu5JjFv4qWQP%2BggirDgVLTkWRvVKSQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207281106040.53430@fledge.watson.org> References: <201207222219.q6MMJeAL032049@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207281106040.53430@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 July 2012 03:07, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
> A further consideration in the source code-related sections is that building
> your own {world, kernel} will bump you off the support path for binary
> updates and upgrades with freebsd-update. This is increasingly a
> consideration for our default kernel configuration: kernel options that
> require recompilation force users not to use the most user-friendly upgrade
> path we have.
I've committed some text to this effect.
--
Eitan Adler
Source & Ports committer
X11, Bugbusting teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkOb2XX0k6FbGeYyu5JjFv4qWQP%2BggirDgVLTkWRvVKSQ>