Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:32:38 -0400 From: "fbsd" <fbsd@a1poweruser.com> To: "Beech Rintoul" <beech@alaskaparadise.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Has the port collection become to large to handle. Message-ID: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGEEPDHGAA.fbsd@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <200605131109.33299.beech@alaskaparadise.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"As a port maintainer, it's quite enough work to keep things in sync with one ports tree without having to also worry about a second "convenience" tree that will only benefit a few users." This post says nothing about a second "convenience" tree. Talking about a (to use your term) "convenience" category which fits nicely into the category schema all ready being used. Please read the original post more closely so your comments pertains to what was posted.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGEEPDHGAA.fbsd>