Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:08:11 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, JG <jarek@adeon.lublin.pl>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_W=F6rner?= <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: slow tar performance on fbsd5 Message-ID: <20051014120728.O22507@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <434F7EBA.1090206@algroup.co.uk> References: <134970360.20050825104636@adeon.lublin.pl> <20050825092210.25239.qmail@web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1476333643.20050825224149@adeon.lublin.pl> <434F7EBA.1090206@algroup.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Ben Laurie wrote: > JG wrote: >>> Now I say, what about >>> # cpio -i < mysql-m.tgz >>> (assuming that mysql-m.tgz is in "tar" format)? >> >> Hello, >> >> idea is good, but the result is the same :/ > > The filesystem is _much_ slower in 5 than it is in 4. You can benchmark > it with postmark (in the ports tree) - the difference is huge. If you haven't tried 6.x yet, please do, and see if that improves the situation. And if you run into problems, please report ASAP so we can try to get them fixed before we release. :-) Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051014120728.O22507>