Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:26:49 -0800 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: n dhert <ndhert@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade, batch mode? Message-ID: <86eikw4ws6.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <20100207193216.GA59358@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> (Frank Shute's message of "Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:32:16 %2B0000") References: <8021a2661002070359g6c23344cq744a843024ebf565@mail.gmail.com> <20100207193216.GA59358@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Frank" == Frank Shute <frank@shute.org.uk> writes: Frank> But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C switch is the Frank> way to go. Sadly, I've run across Perl ports that still ask questions, even when being run from portupgrade, and -C doesn't help those. I'm guessing from this description that I should be noticing these and reporting it to someone? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86eikw4ws6.fsf>