Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:22:06 +0100 From: n j <nino80@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL_FORWARD Message-ID: <92bcbda51003161522j2b8081a6x9978b27416c8665c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B992EE8.30309@elischer.org> References: <92bcbda51003100912k25facb5cxc9047105c91a4022@mail.gmail.com> <4B97E412.1050506@elischer.org> <4B981FE5.5090905@smartt.com> <4B9828B2.2010903@elischer.org> <92bcbda51003110047s717bed1bq8bb3eb787eab47f7@mail.gmail.com> <4B992EE8.30309@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> it's needed for the functionality. > you need to slightly change the behaviour or the existing stack in quite a > number of places to handle a forwarded packet. Sorry for catching up with the thread so late, I was without Internet connection for the last couple of days. Thanks for all the replies so far, I've got just one more question: is it correct that pf (as loadable module) has this forward (aka route-to) functionality without needing the kernel recompile? If so, it might be that final push for me to switch from ipfw to pf. Regards, -- Nino
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92bcbda51003161522j2b8081a6x9978b27416c8665c>