Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 16:36:17 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Thread calls Message-ID: <XFMail.980902163617.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199809020702.AAA21352@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02-Sep-98 Terry Lambert wrote: > > So, from what I hear, noone is implementing these calls in FreeBSD's > > libc_r? > There is an OpenLDAP effort, which will necessitate these calls being > implemented and/or the PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER going away until FreeBSD > complies with Draft 10 (Standard) pthreads. So, why was the PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER thing implemented if it broke the ability to easily check between standards? ie is there a good reason to not back that change out until a more comprehensive set of patches comes along? --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.980902163617.doconnor>