Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:59:37 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: julian@freebsd.org Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why we need SACK Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301101659010.44549-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <3E1F691A.5060508@vicor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
SOrry guys I don;t know why this ^$%#^# mail program encodes plain text files as Java.. will resend.. On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > The internet is becoming a rather horrid place for packets sometimes.. > Here's a trace. In this case SACK would have been a true blessing... > > Is there anyone considering looking at the varous SACK implementations > to see if one might be fixed enough to be imported? > > (these were two 4.5 (+-) machines) talking through a vpn that apparently > doesn't conserve packet order. (ipsec)), > Link latency is about 73 mSecs, link bandwidth is about 300kBytes/sec. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0301101659010.44549-100000>