Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:42:05 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> To: "Igor B. Bykhalo" <goshik@binep.ac.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: little heads up (for gigabase users) Message-ID: <20030619134205.GK86248@freebsd.org.ru> In-Reply-To: <029301c33667$7a1f2a20$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru> References: <20030618193910.GW86248@freebsd.org.ru> <029301c33667$7a1f2a20$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:34:10PM +0400, Igor B. Bykhalo wrote: > > I'm planning to commit following patch for databases/gigabase. > > It fix problem with database/fastdb port. > > > > Both ports have a subsql and libcli_r.[a.so], but tool and libraries > > of ports are > > 1) uncompatible > > 2) have the same names > > I'm running oops+gigabase, should i just rebuild > gigabase and then oops, or first i need to delete > gigabase completely (and make sure there are no more > old libraries left)? I think oops port unaffect by this changes, because oops use only gigabase_r.so.2 library, which name do not change. If you really need new (fixed) version of gigabase - just upgrade gigabase port. -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030619134205.GK86248>