Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:18:17 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: lconrad@go2france.com Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10.1-RELEASE-p1 needs newvers.sh update Message-ID: <86lhmf2ix2.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <5488b275.42f.2abeba00.25fd6804@go2france.com> (lconrad@go2france.com's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:52:05 -0600") References: <5488b275.42f.2abeba00.25fd6804@go2france.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
lconrad@go2france.com writes: > freebsd-update fetch > [...] > No updates needed to update system to 10.1-RELEASE-p1. > > but after reboot: > > uname -a > FreeBSD rns1.hctc.net 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: > Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 > root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Yes, because the kernel was not affected by any of the advisories. Use freebsd-version(1) to determine the userland patch level. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86lhmf2ix2.fsf>