Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:13:54 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang Message-ID: <20100517091354.GE83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100517064908.GX56080@hoeg.nl> References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl> <4BEEE8A9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20100517064908.GX56080@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:49:08AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello Doug, > > Sorry for the delay, but I was on my way back from Ottawa. > > * Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > I was hoping someone else would bring this up, but no one has so here > > goes. There seems to be a whole little sub-hierarchy under > > usr.bin/clang, including the lib stuff you mentioned above. Is this > > necessary for some reason, or could the bmake bits be placed in their > > normal locations in the tree before the project is imported? > > Well, I do agree the directory naming isn't perfect, but at least it is > stored in such a way that it doesn't spread out too much across the > tree. Things would get a real mess if we used directories like > lib/libclangast. > > If someone can think of a better directory naming scheme, be sure to let > me know. lib/clang/..., as it is done for bind ? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvxCNIACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hNBQCgppgE19nYV5i2stcHManbDP7T NYsAn1XRyg6/v+1+keVCAMKD7bceAiaK =5nLK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100517091354.GE83316>