Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 10:30:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Michael Maxwell <drwho@xnet.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Log message improvement for rpc.statd Message-ID: <200008211430.KAA06409@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200008191817.NAA09304@drwho.xnet.com> References: <200008191817.NAA09304@drwho.xnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:18:13 -0500 (CDT), Michael Maxwell <drwho@xnet.com> said: > RPC is, by nature, insecure. Not true. It's just our implementation (copied from Sun) that's insecure. There are plenty of secure RPC protocols around -- including some that fit within the Sun ONC framework (such as RPCSEC_GSS as used in Kerberos 5's admin protocol). -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008211430.KAA06409>