Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:09:11 -0700 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Our aging base system heimdal Message-ID: <AANLkTimSdNOfX7kKgjWwUXuuRGISMrtzQVhQINaCfTml@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <AANLkTik213g_8W2ocr3mCCb2EED8RBXsYBavdYll1PI_@mail.gmail.com> <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized? Jos On Jun 6, 2010 12:28 PM, "Garrett Wollman" <wollman@bimajority.org> wrote: <<On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:59 +0000, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> said: > Is anybody planning to... I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system components that depend on it to learn how to use either Kerberos implementation from ports. (I'd also love for the ancient and broken base version of libcom_err to go away -- there's no knob to turn it off, and the shared library conflicts with ports/krb5.) (And yes, this is a bit of an irony considering that I used to be the maintainer of the base-system Kerberos code in the long-ago krb4 days. But my job requires me to administer MIT Kerberos, so I need the MIT kadmin utility and not the Heimdal one.) -GAWollman _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimSdNOfX7kKgjWwUXuuRGISMrtzQVhQINaCfTml>