Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:45:27 +0200 From: Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/54769: [patch] updates to FAQ Message-ID: <20030723204527.GA1581@daemon.li> In-Reply-To: <200307231010.h6NAAIGB022517@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> wrote: > These changes are bogus; Windows 2000 (at least, I don't know about XP), > like Windows NT, doesn't touch the boot manager. You can install FreeBSD > and Windows 2000 in whichever order you like. i have to admit i do not have good windows knowledge, i remember it as a posession taking operating system. while reading the FAQs i just thought 95/98 to be outdated. what about my 3.X->4.X to 4.X->5.X changes? i hope they are more valuable. greets, josef -- www: http://www.daemon.li nic-hdl: JER1080312-NICAT FreeBSD PortMaintainer "Make World - Not War!"home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030723204527.GA1581>