Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:47:44 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: net@freebsd.org Cc: bmilekic@unixdaemons.com Subject: Re: virtually contig jumbo mbufs (was Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot) Message-ID: <200207051747.g65HliO2003668@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20020705132735.A873@unixdaemons.com> References: <20020619090046.A2063@panzer.kdm.org> <15653.35606.290023.621040@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200207051645.g65Gj1lM003467@vashon.polstra.com> <20020705132735.A873@unixdaemons.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20020705132735.A873@unixdaemons.com>, Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:45:01AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > The BCM570x chips (bge driver) definitely need a single physically > > contiguous buffer for each received packet. > > This is totally ridiculous for gigE hardware, IMO. WHOOPS, I'm afraid I have to correct myself. The BCM570x chips do indeed support multiple buffers for jumbo packets. I'm sorry for the earlier misinformation! John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207051747.g65HliO2003668>