Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:16:33 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Chris H <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system Message-ID: <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <FF875A44-0FEE-4940-9A2E-5774BC6769F5@gid.co.uk> References: <b01aff4a37f97ff41a9f881be591f5c8@ultimatedns.net> <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> <FF875A44-0FEE-4940-9A2E-5774BC6769F5@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for > pure at bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care > may get an uneasy feeling. https://bitbucket.org/purelang/pure-lang/downloads/ has 0.66 ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170306141633.GP13006>