Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:09:52 +0200 From: Gunnar Flygt <gunnar.flygt@sr.se> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8-RELEASE vs SA-03:07 Message-ID: <20030402070952.GD37762@sr.se> In-Reply-To: <20030402022110.GA6181@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030401141454.N43325-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <87znnaw7vq.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <20030401224035.R474@trillian.santala.org> <20030401222116.GB5246@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030402021244.GA7705@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030402022110.GA6181@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 06:21:10PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 06:12:44PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > I think this does not automaticly follow. If you use the -RC label for > > identifying the release when it's in a state of final QA and not to > > identify the release when it's in -ALPHA or -BETA state, then you avoid > > using the -RELEASE label when it's still possible that tags slide. > > And what about the last-minute (but easily fixed) bug that is > discovered after the -RELEASE tag goes down, whenever that happens in > the process? Either you slide the tag to fix the bug or you don't. > That's what the original poster was talking about. > > Kris Isn't this much fuzz for nothing, really? All there is to it is wait for the "Release Officer" to announce that 4.8 i RELEASED. Then it is Released. -- Gunnar Flygt OPC Data Sveriges Radio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030402070952.GD37762>