Date: Mon, 20 Feb 1995 07:33:36 -0500 From: L Jonas Olsson <ljo@amcell2.caisr.cwru.edu> To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: libcompat and shlib conflict Message-ID: <199502201233.HAA01665@amcell2.caisr.cwru.edu> In-Reply-To: <199502200534.WAA01333@trout.sri.MT.net> (message from Nate Williams on Sun, 19 Feb 1995 22:34:04 -0700)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Isn't the idea not to have a shared libcompat? This library is supposed to disappear (at least some functions in it) and we don't want binaries to depend on having these functions in new releases. This also gives an extra incentive to fix programs that use it as their binaries will be larger :) Jonas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502201233.HAA01665>