Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:35:52 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Compiling only "network" part of the kernel Message-ID: <5A2883E2-C132-4E56-900D-5CCDE42A1FD2@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112271315520.37231@wonkity.com> References: <CA%2BDF=vyFTgr1PfvG0qPo9hv3VmygB9FqiqYqhKs1C26bMzJvmA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112270746410.34454@wonkity.com> <4EF9E2D6.7050705@my.gd> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112271024390.36072@wonkity.com> <4EFA1BC1.5060605@my.gd> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112271315520.37231@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Dec 2011, at 21:22, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > >>> Those are best-case times. A typical ccache buildworld after csup to >>> -stable is about 9 minutes on this system. >> >> That sounds good enough. >> >> Are there any performance hits during production, as in, when not busy >> rebuilding the world or whatever, just normal daily operation ? > > ccache is only called when compiling. There's a little extra overhead in make.conf, probably not significant. And the disk space used for the cache. Thanks for a the info Warren, I'll see about putting it in production, I'd love saving some time when updating boxes. Besides, smaller update times (as in, human time spent) will help me defend fbsd against debian kfreebsd :/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A2883E2-C132-4E56-900D-5CCDE42A1FD2>