Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:08:39 -0600 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: tec@mega.net.br Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD data size tuning Message-ID: <3FBE1C67.9060506@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20031121.cyV.23876100@admin.mega.net.br> References: <20031121.cyV.23876100@admin.mega.net.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
TEC Meganet wrote: >it's here >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/announce.html > It says: "We encourage all our users to evaluate FreeBSD 5.1 and the upcoming 5.2. Because PAE support has only been a feature in 4.X for a few months, it has not received wide-spread testing, and our most conservative users may wish to stay with FreeBSD 4.8 until they choose to migrate to 5.X." Which is a lot different than: "The BSd people suggest not using 4.9in production servers." >Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote*: > > >>On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >>Content-Description: signed data >> >> >>>On Friday 21 November 2003 10:52, TEC Meganet wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The BSd people suggest not using 4.9 >>>>in production servers. >>>> >>>> >>>They do? >>> >>> >>No. Or at least, I know of no such thing, and it would be interesting >>to learn where and who and how has anything like that been suggested :) >> >> Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology All generalizations are false, including this one. ------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FBE1C67.9060506>