Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:57:42 +0000 From: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Pau Amma <pauamma@gundo.com>, koobs@freebsd.org, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: <YZytBkvuIvS9%2BLwN@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <fa837481-38a1-d6bc-ebc4-90e48eba7f5c@quip.cz> References: <CAH7qZfvBQ0gKEdOn7nTuzAbMOG9LM2DVGyUs9b9PGwNgJTDCAw@mail.gmail.com> <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> <YZtnBObluID4XlnG@freefall.freebsd.org> <fa837481-38a1-d6bc-ebc4-90e48eba7f5c@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: > >> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > >>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > >> > >> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 > >> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > > > > Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is > > doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium > > is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port > > is already a lot. > > Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium is > not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, > or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / tracking) > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: feel free to bring it back and maintain it. Regards, René
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YZytBkvuIvS9%2BLwN>