Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:46:59 -0200 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> Cc: sam@errno.com Subject: Re: tcp hostcache and ip fastforward for review Message-ID: <3FB3B583.1060307@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <3FB2BE8A.6C880085@pipeline.ch> References: <3FAE68FB.64D262FF@pipeline.ch> <20031112225326.GI41949@FreeBSD.org> <3FB2BE8A.6C880085@pipeline.ch>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Andre Oppermann wrote: >>If we stored special "for us" /32 routes in the routing table for >>addresses configured on this host, we could avoid the above 2 loops, >>which can quite expensive. > > Good idea. I will look at that after 5.2 code freeze. Question from someone who doesn't really understand the code... Presently, if I have a /32 route defined, I can't add an alias to the same address to an interface. I was expecting this changes to make that possible, which would be really useful to me, and it seems the suggestion above would make that not possible again... So, just in case I'm reading the situation correctly, here's my request for it not to happen. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral Gerência de Operações Divisão de Comunicação de Dados Coordenação de Segurança VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@tcoip.com.brhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB3B583.1060307>