Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:46:59 -0200 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> Cc: sam@errno.com Subject: Re: tcp hostcache and ip fastforward for review Message-ID: <3FB3B583.1060307@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <3FB2BE8A.6C880085@pipeline.ch> References: <3FAE68FB.64D262FF@pipeline.ch> <20031112225326.GI41949@FreeBSD.org> <3FB2BE8A.6C880085@pipeline.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andre Oppermann wrote: >>If we stored special "for us" /32 routes in the routing table for >>addresses configured on this host, we could avoid the above 2 loops, >>which can quite expensive. >=20 > Good idea. I will look at that after 5.2 code freeze. Question from someone who doesn't really understand the code...=20 Presently, if I have a /32 route defined, I can't add an alias to the=20 same address to an interface. I was expecting this changes to make that=20 possible, which would be really useful to me, and it seems the=20 suggestion above would make that not possible again... So, just in case I'm reading the situation correctly, here's my request=20 for it not to happen. :-) --=20 Daniel C. Sobral Ger=EAncia de Opera=E7=F5es Divis=E3o de Comunica=E7=E3o de Dados Coordena=E7=E3o de Seguran=E7a VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@tcoip.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB3B583.1060307>