Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 08:03:39 -0800 From: "jfesler@calweb.com" <jflists@calweb.com> To: Stephen McKay <syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reverse DNS not all bad Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971128080339.00a03930@pop.calweb.com> In-Reply-To: <199711281251.WAA09031@troll.dtir.qld.gov.au> References: <199711281239.EAA10581@hub.freebsd.org> <199711281239.EAA10581@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:51 PM 11/28/97 +1000, you wrote: >It's really quite tricky to get around this sort of problem. As anti-spam >measures are taken up by people with less and less experience I expect more >of this. Oops, that looks like a sly dig. You know what I mean, I hope. It's specifically this reason that the filters I wrote here (front-ends to sendmail, sorry, not sendmail.cf rules) specically permit mail to postmaster, even when normally mail would be refused otherwise. Error messages also refer to sendmail "postmaster" email. I would *think* that sendmail rules could also be written to permit mail for postmaster for domain level MAIL FROM:/RCPT TO: blocks, but I'm not a sendmail wizard. -- Jason Fesler jfesler@calweb.com 'whois jf319' | When the chips are down Admin, CalWeb Internet Services www.calweb.com | The buffalo's empty Junk email returned in bulk; 1 cc to your postmaster | Junk mail probs? http://www.gigo.com/junkmail.htm | :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.3.32.19971128080339.00a03930>