Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:29:03 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> Cc: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Subject: Re: kernel.old not used any longer? Message-ID: <20050419162903.GA12342@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050419160623.GA2922@energistic.com> References: <200504191530.j3JFUvWD030545@energistic.com> <42652533.8060106@centtech.com> <001501c544f5$f6fc3fd0$9b00030a@officescape.net> <20050419160623.GA2922@energistic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:06:23AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > No. doing 'make buildkernel' and 'make installkernel' seperately does > not cause /boot/kernel to be copied to /boot/kernel.old. /usr/src/Makefile: kernel: buildkernel installkernel No difference in doing it separately. cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/<kernname> ; make -n install gives me: ... thiskernel=`sysctl -n kern.bootfile` ; if [ "`dirname "$thiskernel"`" != /boot/kernel ] ; then chflags -R noschg /boot/kernel ; rm -rf /boot/kernel ; else if [ -d /boot/kernel.old ] ; then chflags -R noschg /boot/kernel.old ; rm -rf /boot/kernel.old ; fi ; mv /boot/kernel /boot/kernel.old ; sysctl kern.bootfile=/boot/kernel.old/"`basename "$thiskernel"`" ; fi ... What so you get ? Marc --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCZTHPezjnobFOgrERAimsAKDKdNSX7FADkR7w6XLSAO6gAPUTMACgnj9j FeeJe6ohCgZILSujKuWz+Aw= =7Wp4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050419162903.GA12342>