Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:17:36 -0700 From: Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bhyve vs signals Message-ID: <CAFgRE9HFC6HD-smFSrMoetLP27p0AN2zQaVHYkfoQ5iPnN8fjQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55A4C9F3.9060003@FreeBSD.org> References: <55A4C9F3.9060003@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Andriy, On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I couldn't find any information in bhyve(8) on how bhyve responds to various > signals. It seems that at least SIGTERM is intercepted and translated to an > ACPI power event. How about other signals? What's the best signal to use to > kill a hung VM that can not be stopped gracefully? > 'bhyvectl --force-poweroff --vm=vmname' is a good way to forcibly kill a wedged VM. best Neel > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFgRE9HFC6HD-smFSrMoetLP27p0AN2zQaVHYkfoQ5iPnN8fjQ>