Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:08:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Danilo Egea <daniloegea@yahoo.com.br> To: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Frank Mitchell <mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> Subject: Re: Assembly continues to be used in the development of FreeBSD? Message-ID: <1396984089.24824.YahooMailNeo@web162002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20140408184445.GA79554@jerrymc.net> References: <COL127-W467DCAD7917F70A0590C7BE8680@phx.gbl> <14679.1396898970@critter.freebsd.dk> <201404081711.34003.mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> <1396974609.81853.443.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20140408184445.GA79554@jerrymc.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
This guy is a well-known troll in our Brazilian list. He was banned from our list. I suggest that someone kick his ass right now. Em Terça-feira, 8 de Abril de 2014 15:56, Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> escreveu: On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:30:09AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: Ever notice how someone posts something somewhat off-topic or flame provocative on one of the lists and then we get up to several dozen posts saying feed the troll and ban the troll, etc. All the ban-ists generate more useless traffic (including this one) than any troll and responses. ////jerry > 1) It's off-topic for this list. > > 2) The person has an ever-growing history of trolling this list (and > probably just needs to be banned at this point). Not the usual "trying > to make flames" kind of trolling, the more insidious "act just barely > reasonable enough to get lots of people to waste lots of time" kind of > trolling. > > If you want to discuss vague generalities around the issue of assembler > language programming, I'm sure you can find an appropriate forum to do > so that doesn't also spam people trying to get freebsd work done. > > -- Ian > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:11 +0100, Frank Mitchell wrote: > > Why are people moaning just because the guy wants to discuss Assembly? He's > > not doing any harm. Some of us are interested, even if we don't want to get > > into Assembly personally. > > > > On Monday 07 Apr 2014 20:29:30 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message <COL127-W467DCAD7917F70A0590C7BE8680@phx.gbl>, Jorge Luis > > > Carvalho Santos writes: > > > > > >According to the book "Complete and Total C" by Herbert Schildt, > > > >the general rule is not to use Assembly because it creates too many > > > >problems. > > > > > > Don't feed the troll. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 19:16:04 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBFE42C; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94892181D; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from study64.tdx.co.uk (study64.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.231]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id s38JG2EP077873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits%6 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:16:02 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:16:02 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Stuck CLOSED sockets / sshd / zombies... Message-ID: <08A1E4111BEA2A26F6D44423@study64.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201404081219.51276.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <3FE645E9723756F22EF901AE@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <201404080936.30651.jhb@freebsd.org> <63EFBCBD259A410BB4D71742@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <201404081219.51276.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 19:16:05 -0000 --On 8 April 2014 12:19:51 -0400 John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: >> [Switching to LWP 100218] >> 0x00000008038ea89c in __error () from /lib/libthr.so.3 >> (gdb) bt >> # 0 0x00000008038ea89c in __error () from /lib/libthr.so.3 >> # 1 0x00000008038e104f in __thr_rwlock_rdlock (rwlock=0x803af9480, >> flags=<value optimized out>, tsp=<value optimized out>) >> at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_umtx.c:277 >> # 2 0x00000008038e821c in _thr_rtld_rlock_acquire (lock=0x803af9480) at >> atomic.h:143 >> # 3 0x000000080064f9a2 in rlock_acquire (lock=0x80085fe00, >> lockstate=0x7fffffffba68) at /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c:197 >> # 4 0x00000008006498c9 in _rtld_bind (obj=0x800662000, reloff008) at >> /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:675 >> # 5 0x00000008006470cd in _rtld_bind_start () at >> /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/amd64/rtld_start.S:99 >> # 6 0x0000000000000246 in ?? () >> # 7 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () >> " > > Can you do 'frame 3' and ' p *lock' as well as 'frame 1' and 'p *rwlock'? Sure, " (gdb) frame 3 #3 0x000000080064f9a2 in rlock_acquire (lock=0x80085fe00, lockstate=0x7fffffffba68) at /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c:197 197 lockinfo.rlock_acquire(lock->handle); Current language: auto; currently minimal (gdb) p *lock $1 = {handle = 0x803af9480, mask = 1} (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x00000008038e104f in __thr_rwlock_rdlock (rwlock=0x803af9480, flags=<value optimized out>, tsp=<value optimized out>) at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_umtx.c:277 277 return _umtx_op_err(rwlock, UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK, flags, (void *)tm_size, tm_p); (gdb) p *rwlock $2 = {rw_state = -2147483648, rw_flags = 2, rw_blocked_readers = 0, rw_blocked_writers = 0, rw_spare = {0, 0, 0, 0}} " -Karlhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1396984089.24824.YahooMailNeo>