Date: Sun, 23 Jul 95 2:36:50 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org, harry@hgac.com, jkh@violet.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: dial up at > 9600 baud Message-ID: <9507230836.AA25387@cs.weber.edu> In-Reply-To: <cVAwU4maH1@astral.msk.su> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka" at Jul 23, 95 10:39:06 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I don't think I quite understand why the previous behaviour was a > >problem in the first place -- perhas the original poster could explain > >the rationale for his changes a bit better? > > > The problem: initial port speed 9600, getty speed 38400 f.e., > port opened on carrier at 9600, modem detects it and set > connection to 9600 too, _then_ getty change port speed to 38400 > confusing modem completely. > > I understand that problem solves by locking port on 38400 > initially, but it isn't nice solution, getty must able > to open port at correct speed setted in its flags. I guess I still don't understand how the modem magically detects the port speed when the port sets the baud before it says anything (like "login: "). Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9507230836.AA25387>