Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:49:54 +0200 From: "Patrick O'Reilly" <patrick@mip.co.za> To: "Dan Nelson" <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: "FreeBSD Question List" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Multiple NameD instances ? Message-ID: <NDBBIMKICMDGDMNOOCAIMEILDPAA.patrick@mip.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20011122154248.GB11921@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] > Sent: 22 November 2001 17:43 > > In the last episode (Nov 22), Patrick O'Reilly said: > > Is there a way to run two instances of named on one box, with > one instance > > answering any requests that enter on the public interface, and the other > > instance answering the private interface? > > > > Or, can one instance be configured to answer both, but making private > > information available internally only, but public information available > > either way? > > BIND 9 (in ports) has the concept of "views", where you can define an > internal and external view with different zones for the same domain, > and configure named to use one zone or the other based on the IP of the > client requesting the inromation. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com Thanks Dan! That sounds like an elegant solution! Now, 'named -v' tells me I have 'named 8.2.4-REL', and searching the ports reveals "Port: bind-8.2.3" and "Port: bind-9.1.1". So, I expect I'll need to be installing the port for 9.1.1? Does anyone have any idea if/when bind 9 will move into the "standard" BSD installation? Patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NDBBIMKICMDGDMNOOCAIMEILDPAA.patrick>