Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 09:24:04 +0300 (EET DST) From: Seppo Kallio <kallio@cc.jyu.fi> To: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hackers-digest@freebsd.org, Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Subject: Re: hackers-digest V1 #1436 Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.92.960905091952.16502B-100000@kanto.cc.jyu.fi> In-Reply-To: <199609040312.UAA17647@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 14:00:17 -0400 > Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions) > > >E-mail message from Dennis contained: > >> > >> You left out one big disadvantage. The Kernel implementation is a pile > >> of crap, and that different combinations of drivers will yield almost random > >> results in terms of reliability and stability. > >> > >> Just my impression. > > > >Shame that no one really cares about it. All the people want to see is that > >it's so easy for newcommers. Just like Windows. In more than one aspect :) How is Slackware so easy? Is there some difference. I think differences are very small. Here people use DOS h/w, not Apple hardware because ALL OTHER use DOS h/w, here people use Linux because ALL OTHERS use Linux. I think tehre is nothing bad if people select easy systems. I should select Macintosh if I could, but when all others are using DOS h/w it is stupid to be alone Seppo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.92.960905091952.16502B-100000>