Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:56:48 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Duncan Barclay <dmlb@dmlb.org> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> Subject: Re: do we have support for the Beagle Board? Message-ID: <86eiw0uvsv.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86r600uxrr.fsf@ds4.des.no> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rg?= =?utf-8?Q?rav=22's?= message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:14:16 %2B0200") References: <49DD0DD2.8080806@telenix.org> <20090409085601.b54eb5y31ckwcwww@0x20.net> <49DDB2DA.9090409@unsane.co.uk> <49DE2449.8050007@telenix.org> <49DE5489.5060201@dmlb.org> <86r600uxrr.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > So why didn't they just use a TI DaVinci or DaVinci HD? It's an ARMv5 > core and a 64x DSP on a single chip, with something like 2 MB of shared > SRAM. ...if I remember correctly; it's been over a year since I last worked on one. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86eiw0uvsv.fsf>