Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:28:33 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r382341 - in head/lang: gcc46 gcc47 gcc48 gcc49 gcc5 Message-ID: <55147A01.8080201@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <55147853.30309@FreeBSD.org> References: <201503262036.t2QKa4Aw076378@svn.freebsd.org> <55147032.4020401@FreeBSD.org> <551470F9.60306@marino.st> <551472A3.8000105@FreeBSD.org> <5514746C.5010909@marino.st> <55147853.30309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/26/2015 22:21, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > You again ignore everything I say here. You then justify it because 1 > portmgr approved it, and then go on to tell me portmgr is a committee. > This blanket was never officially voted on. You can't have it both ways. > AFAIK changing -pthread to -lpthread was not voted on either. You said it yourself; you've been anti-DragonFly from day 1, and nothing I do will change that. You are not neutral on this topic. Yours is the only anti-DragonFly feedback I get. Everyone else seems pleased with my work and nobody else is complaining about the additions. I can infer they think the positive far outweighs the negative. So yeah -- I'm going to ask for a consensus when it comes to anti-DragonFly vitriol. Thanks. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55147A01.8080201>