Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:41:24 -0500
From:      Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
To:        FreeBSD AMD list <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: major pita w/LSI Tyan TA26 combo
Message-ID:  <BC4F7EBE-6A7A-4683-9E56-999FCB0EC334@khera.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060305123941.4a890a73.kgunders@teamcool.net>
References:  <20060303133844.451cb4f7.kgunders@teamcool.net> <200603031343.10334.fcash@ocis.net> <E8B9BFA8-AEF9-4820-8817-523ACAC53B18@khera.org> <20060305123941.4a890a73.kgunders@teamcool.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:

> And.. my original issues that I opened w/LSI and Tyan was w/, you
> guessed it, position 0.  Of course Tyan reports that I'm the only one
> reporting such problems...

how interesting....

>
>> The funny thing is that and Adaptec 2230SLP card has no issues with
>> the array whatsoever.  I've not had problems with LSI cards on risers
>> before.
>
>> From myunderstanding from talking to LSI support Adaptec cards will
> automatically drop to U160 if they can't keep up w/U320??

they told me this too.  however, if i query the card with aaccli, it  
reports every device is running at 320 speed.  So someone/something  
is not entirely truthful.

however, the speed of the adaptec is about 80% that of the LSI  
according to diskinfo tests.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BC4F7EBE-6A7A-4683-9E56-999FCB0EC334>