Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:54:30 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) Message-ID: <201109131754.p8DHsUXo061135@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 BST." <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100 > Message-id: <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com> Chris Rees wrote: > On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > >> >> the first place). > >> > > >> > Bullshit! > >> > >> I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > >> should stop it. > > > > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked. > > FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers. > > > > Julian, > > Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't > think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them. > > Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break. > > Chris Your proposal to remove procmail among others was ridiculous. Please consider resigning Chris. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17 Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ 22 Oct.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201109131754.p8DHsUXo061135>