Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:44:25 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.firewall Message-ID: <ygeveypkrom.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <437EC789.1090709@elischer.org> References: <200511190607.jAJ6700C075492@repoman.freebsd.org> <437EC789.1090709@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:34:49 -0800
>>>>> Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> said:
julian> Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
julian> huh?
julian> divert of an ipv6 packet still makes sense!
I don't say that divert of an IPv6 doesn't make sence. The existing
implementation of both divert and nat cannot handle an IPv6. So, when
an IPv6 support for ipfw2 is enabled, the line doesn't pass the IPv6
packets.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygeveypkrom.wl%ume>