Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 10:31:55 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Simon Shapiro <shimon@Simon-Shapiro.ORG> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disklabel Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904031029180.65636-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <99040222094909.22286@nomis.simon-shapiro.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Simon Shapiro wrote: > Is it my imagination or lack of attention, or a problem? > > It appears that if I disklabel a drive on a PC, the label will not be > visible on an Alpha? > > Why do that? Linux fdisk (on the alpha) is a bit broken, so I thought > to disklabel on a PC and move the disks. No cigar. > > So, either this is the case, or the two are so incompatible that they > write/read totally different areas on the disk. > > BTW, Linux thinks that there is partition 4 on the disks. fdisk on the > FreeBSD-i386 side confirms that. > > Yes, I followed the handbook guide and wiped out the first megabyte of > /dev/da16, then disklable -Br, etc. No cigar. The disklabel lives in different places on the two architectures. For i386, it is at block 1, offset 0 and for alpha it is at block 0, offset 64. This is mainly for compatibility with OSF1 and NetBSD but it makes some kind of sense since the first block isn't cluttered up with executable code on the alpha. To add to the fun, disklabel -Br does completely different things on the alpha (like installing alpha executables instead of i386 ones...). -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904031029180.65636-100000>