Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Mar 2011 21:30:28 +0100
From:      =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)
Message-ID:  <C55DBF54-C9A3-4763-8FF3-8A1570A56DAD@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D73D20C.2010706@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20110227202957.GD1992@garage.freebsd.pl>	<4D73098F.3000807@FreeBSD.org>	<59D664AA-76C6-45C7-94CE-5AA63080368C@FreeBSD.org> <4D738DB0.1090603@FreeBSD.org> <4D739D96.5090705@FreeBSD.org> <D79A9668-5280-4892-B6F3-094F2633AF2B@FreeBSD.org> <4D73D20C.2010706@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. =
19:27:
> On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napiera=B3a wrote:
>>=20
>> The above looks like old-style, "canonical six" trivial ACL.  Now,
>> cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there
>> is nothing to copy.  So, for some reason, something failed between
>> cp(1), acl_is_trivial_np(3) and the kernel.
>>=20
>> What does "ls -al /usr/local/tinderbox/scripts/lib/buildscript" show?
>=20
> It looks like:
>=20
> - -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root  wheel  12547 Feb  1 21:21
> /usr/local/tinderbox/scripts/lib/buildscript

r219272 introduced an error which made libc treat the "canonical six"
ACLs as nontrivial.  I backed it out; you need to rebuild libc.  Sorry.

--
If you cut off my head, what would I say?  Me and my head, or me and my =
body?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C55DBF54-C9A3-4763-8FF3-8A1570A56DAD>