Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:50:34 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> To: Arjan van Leeuwen <avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO goes after BSD? Message-ID: <20031118215034.GN385@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> References: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:19:07PM +0100, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: Content-Description: signed data > From http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=3D03/11/18/1742216 : >=20 > (about the teleconference today) > I, for one, don't care how SCO pays its counsel. But I do care about=20 > something new that came out of the teleconference.=20 >=20 > SCO is going to attack the 1994 AT&T/BSD settlement. That's a very intere= sting=20 > item that the few favored analysts (and only a select few journalists) wh= o=20 > were allowed to ask questions failed to pick up on. Here's our take on wh= y=20 > SCO is embarking on this new course of action: >=20 > (read the article for more info) >=20 > What to think of this? It's difficult to say when the only quote on the page is "broad and deep". I would rather see exactly what SCO said regarding the 1994 settlement before making my mind up, but my gut reaction is that someone has been at the crack pipe again. Ceri --=20 --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/upQqocfcwTS3JF8RAgIpAJ4p7iUMFhVWBGL8b6htzMNQFCj9PwCfVUp/ HTi+tov/DV2OlIY+m3ulwZA= =Eqpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031118215034.GN385>